Crandon School District
Crandon School District is located in northeast Wisconsin. Crandon School District has 511.90 square miles of land area and 21.96 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Crandon School District population is 5,831. Crandon School District median household income is $39,044 in 2010-2014. Crandon School District median house value is $135,700 in 2010-2014. On average, Crandon School District is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Crandon School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
9750 Us Hwy 8 West
Crandon WI, 54520, Forest County
Phone: 715-478-3339
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 917 | 932 | 930 | 913 | 938 | 953 | 971 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 59.15 | 58.94 | 61.05 | 67.50 | 67.50 | 70.30 | 68.80 |
Prekindergarten: | 2.60 | 2.75 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Kindergarten: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
Elementary: | 24.40 | 24.35 | 23.57 | 27.07 | 27.07 | 27.70 | 26.70 |
Secondary: | 28.15 | 27.84 | 30.48 | 32.43 | 31.43 | 33.60 | 33.10 |
Ungraded: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 70.00 | 70.05 | 65.65 | 63.23 | 66.13 | 68.70 | 68.70 |
Instructional Aides: | 20.88 | 21.13 | 20.00 | 21.00 | 22.00 | 20.50 | 20.00 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.00 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
Library/Media Support: | 2.50 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrators: | 2.40 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
School Administrators: | 3.00 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 4.50 | 3.00 | 3.93 | 4.93 | 4.93 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Student Support Services: | 4.92 | 4.92 | 4.32 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 9.10 | 9.60 |
Other Support Services: | 24.80 | 24.15 | 24.90 | 20.70 | 20.70 | 20.40 | 20.40 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.50 | 15.81 | 15.23 | 13.53 | 13.90 | 13.56 | 14.11 |
Schools
Crandon Alternative Resource School (Cars) | Grade 7 to Grade 12 | 9750 Us Hwy 8 West, Crandon WI 54520 | |
Crandon Elementary | Prekindergarten to Grade 5 | 9750 Us Hwy 8 West, Crandon WI 54520 | |
Crandon High | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 9750 Us Hwy 8 West, Crandon WI 54520 | |
Crandon Middle | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 9750 Us Hwy 8 West, Crandon WI 54520 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
WKCE Test | |||||
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 69% |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 48% | 70% |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 73% |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 71% |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 74% |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 73% |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 53% | 76% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 71% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 70% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 72% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 73% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 74% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 31% | 47% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 62% | 74% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 55% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 78% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 80% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 27% | 40% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 70% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 70% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 65% | 74% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 76% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 75% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 78% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 73% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 74% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 78% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 77% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 82% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 82% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 49% | 77% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 49% | 75% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 23% | 50% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63% | 80% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 56% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 15% | 35% |
2005 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 59% | 78% |
2009 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 78% |
2010 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 59% | 78% |
2011 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 63% | 77% |
2012 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 78% |
2013 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 61% | 77% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 71% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 82% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 58% | 81% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 77% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 62% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 31% | 50% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 62% | 81% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 60% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 20% | 33% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 65% | 78% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73% | 77% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 55% | 79% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 62% | 79% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 69% | 79% |
2005 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 91% |
2009 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 87% | 92% |
2010 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 93% |
2011 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 92% |
2012 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 93% |
2013 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 51% | 71% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 67% | 79% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 68% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 59% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 68% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 48% | 52% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71% | 82% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 64% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 22% | 36% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 35% | 72% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 52% | 75% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 51% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 69% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 67% | 54% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66% | 82% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 67% | 84% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 61% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 84% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 22% | 35% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 53% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 66% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 57% | 82% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 82% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 53% | 49% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 74% | 84% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75% | 87% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69% | 87% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 24% | 38% |
2004 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 56% | 67% |
2005 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 61% | 64% |
2006 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 52% | 65% |
2009 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 45% | 65% |
2010 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 44% | 66% |
2011 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 63% |
2012 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 69% | 66% |
2013 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 66% | 61% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 54% | 65% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 77% | 72% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 60% | 73% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 80% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 51% | 46% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 79% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 84% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 83% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 74% | 86% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 85% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 88% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93% | 85% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 41% | 42% |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 69% |
2005 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 55% | 73% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 48% | 78% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 65% | 82% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79% |
2004 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 78% | 84% |
2005 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 77% | 83% |
2006 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 83% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 67% | 83% |
2010 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 71% | 82% |
2011 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 83% |
2012 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 82% |
2013 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $11,531,000 | $12,399 | $12,601,000 | $13,802 | $11,633,000 | $12,402 | |||
Federal: | $1,489,000 | $1,601 | 12.9% | $2,207,000 | $2,417 | 17.5% | $1,683,000 | $1,794 | 14.5% |
State: | $3,491,000 | $3,754 | 30.3% | $3,769,000 | $4,128 | 29.9% | $3,448,000 | $3,676 | 29.6% |
Local: | $6,551,000 | $7,044 | 56.8% | $6,625,000 | $7,256 | 52.6% | $6,502,000 | $6,932 | 55.9% |
Total Expenditures: | $11,185,000 | $12,027 | $12,508,000 | $13,700 | $12,307,000 | $13,120 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $10,580,000 | $11,376 | $11,742,000 | $12,861 | $11,630,000 | $12,399 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $6,267,000 | $6,739 | 59.2% | $7,318,000 | $8,015 | 62.3% | $7,303,000 | $7,786 | 62.8% |
Student and Staff Support: | $865,000 | $930 | 8.2% | $1,051,000 | $1,151 | 9.0% | $886,000 | $945 | 7.6% |
Administration: | $1,535,000 | $1,651 | 14.5% | $1,428,000 | $1,564 | 12.2% | $1,489,000 | $1,587 | 12.8% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,913,000 | $2,057 | 18.1% | $1,945,000 | $2,130 | 16.6% | $1,952,000 | $2,081 | 16.8% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $236,000 | $254 | $413,000 | $452 | $187,000 | $199 | |||
Construction: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $115,000 | $124 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $5,546,000 | $5,963 | $6,137,000 | $6,722 | $6,338,000 | $6,757 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $3,850,000 | $4,140 | 69.4% | $4,394,000 | $4,813 | 71.6% | $4,513,000 | $4,811 | 71.2% |
Other Salary: | $1,696,000 | $1,824 | 30.6% | $1,743,000 | $1,909 | 28.4% | $1,825,000 | $1,946 | 28.8% |
Total Benefit: | $3,148,000 | $3,385 | $3,861,000 | $4,229 | $3,618,000 | $3,857 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $2,106,000 | $2,265 | 66.9% | $2,750,000 | $3,012 | 71.2% | $2,591,000 | $2,762 | 71.6% |
Other Benefit: | $1,042,000 | $1,120 | 33.1% | $1,111,000 | $1,217 | 28.8% | $1,027,000 | $1,095 | 28.4% |
* Crandon School District was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.